DaasLabs Manufacturing ← Back to the site
DaasLabs · Manufacturing, automotive & distribution data and AI services

Data & AI services for manufacturers — advise, build, transform, run.

DaasLabs teams set your data and AI strategy, build the platforms, transform supply chain, plants, quality and the channel, and run what we build — for automotive OEMs and suppliers, other manufacturers and trading & distribution businesses. Our Data Fabric Framework, pre-built accelerators and a supervised digital workforce of AI agents are how we deliver it faster.

9
Service lines, strategy to run
3
Segments: automotive, manufacturing, trading & distribution
30–45
Day pilot to a production-ready capability
14
Standing agents in a decision platform we built
02The challenge

Manufacturing data and AI programmes stall because every one starts from zero.

Siloed ERP, plant, engineering, quality and channel systems, knowledge held as free text and long implementations mean value arrives late — or not at all.

Siloed
ERP, MES, PLM, QMS and dealer systems each hold one piece of the picture
Free text
Warranty notes, defect reports and specs that standard reports can't read
Late
Warranty cost and margin leakage visible months after the cause
Manual
Supplier documents, scheme claims and reconciliations chased by hand

Patterns we found in delivered manufacturing and distribution work — not industry statistics.

0369121518 months Typical programme still no production value 1 2 3 4 DaasLabs pilot on the framework & an accelerator 30–45 days to a production-ready capability

1 · No governed data foundation

SAP, MES, PLM, QMS and distributor systems don't agree — master data is duplicated and lineage is unknown.

2 · Services firms rebuild from scratch

Each project re-invents pipelines, models and controls, so timelines and fees grow.

3 · Software alone doesn't change the process

Point products solve one use case and leave integration, data and adoption to the manufacturer.

4 · AI pilots never reach production

Proofs of concept built without data, controls and an operating model stay on the shelf.

03Market shift

Manufacturers are moving from dashboards and copilots to standing agents that watch, quantify and route.

Agents now scan programmes, suppliers, plants and the channel, put a money value on what they find and route it to an owner; people decide.

Then · dashboards and copilots assist a person
Now · a person supervises many agents

So what for a manufacturer: the operating model moves from “a person reads the reports” to “agents do the work, a person supervises many agents” — which makes validation, autonomy limits and audit trails the deciding capabilities, especially where quality, safety and recalls are involved.

14
Electronics design-and-build manufacturer
Standing agents scanning SAP, CRM, PLM and quality data; each alert carries a money impact, an owner and an SLA clock.
DaasLabs case study
40+
Automotive lubricants JV & trading house
Persona views, board to plant and depot, on one reconciled enterprise model with grounded AI briefs.
DaasLabs case study
6
FMCG manufacturer
Value-chain stages, plan to finance, on SAP joined to a distributor management system for secondary sales.
DaasLabs case study
6
Materials science research group
Source-marker types on every R&D answer: the query, passages and figures behind it, with secured formulations.
DaasLabs case study

Counts from platforms as built; demonstration data is modelled or sample data. Client names withheld.

04Who we are

A services firm that arrives with its own IP — so manufacturers pay for outcomes, not reinvention.

05What we do

Nine service lines cover the lifecycle, organised the way manufacturers buy them.

Select a stage on the wheel, or start from your role.

06How we deliver · Data Fabric Framework

A repeatable 4C method turns raw manufacturing data into production-ready capabilities in 30–45 days.

SAP / ERP (FI, MM, PP, SD) MES & machine data PLM & engineering QMS & warranty DMS & dealer systems Specs & documents 167+ pre-built connectors STEP 1 · WEEK 1–2 Connect 167+ connectors, batchand streaming, AI-assistedschema mapping STEP 2 · WEEK 2–4 Curate Standardise, cleanse,enrich: MDM, de-dupand data quality rules STEP 3 · WEEK 3–5 Contextualize Metadata catalog, criticaldata elements, multi-hoplineage, ownership, policy STEP 4 · WEEK 4–6 Consume Data products, APIs, BI,NLQ GenAI studio and theagents behind accelerators Accelerators AI agents BI: Power BI, Tableau APIs & data products NLQ GenAI studio Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6 ConnectCurateContextualizeConsume Production-ready capability in 30–45 days
  1. Step 1 · Week 1–2Connect167+ pre-built connectors: SAP / ERP, MES and machine data, PLM, QMS and warranty, dealer and distributor systems, and documents; batch and streaming.
  2. Step 2 · Week 2–4CurateStandardise, cleanse and enrich: MDM, de-duplication and data quality rules.
  3. Step 3 · Week 3–5ContextualizeMetadata catalog, critical data elements, multi-hop lineage, ownership and policy.
  4. Step 4 · Week 4–6ConsumeData products, APIs, BI, NLQ GenAI studio and the agents behind each accelerator.
GovernancePolicies, ownership, operating model
Metadata & catalogCatalog and glossary
LineageMulti-hop, part to finished good
Data qualityRules, monitoring, controls
AI & agent layerGenAI, ML, agentic workflows
Security & auditRBAC, audit trails, IaC
Built in, not bolted on: foundation layers shared by every engagement — cloud-agnostic on Azure, AWS or hybrid, deployed with Infrastructure as Code.Full architecture →
07How we deliver · Target architecture

Twelve capability layers give every manufacturer one blueprint — and one way to measure progress.

The same layers we build and score in the maturity assessment. Hover a layer to see what it does.

Data foundationConnected, understood, governed
2Data FabricConnect, ingest, CDC, transform
3Active Metadata FabricDiscover, classify, understand and govern data
Meaning & knowledgeBusiness meaning, usable context
4Enterprise OntologyBusiness objects, relationships, semantics
5Knowledge FabricKnowledge graph, vector, documents
6Context EngineeringThe right context for people and agents
Intelligence & actionModels, agents, enterprise actions
1Secure AI GatewayModel access, routing, security
7Agent FabricBuild, orchestrate and run agents
8Action FabricExecute enterprise actions safely
12Enterprise AutomationEvent, API and schedule-driven
Trust & experienceGovern, evaluate, deliver
9Governance & SecurityRBAC/ABAC, policies, approvals, lineage
10AI LifecycleEvaluation, versioning, testing, monitoring
11Experience LayerCopilots, dashboards, apps, workflows

Runs in your cloud tenancy or on-prem. Code, ontology and agents are handed over — you own what we build. Explore the blueprint →

Maturity: five stages, scored on evidence
5Transformational
AI-native
4Systemic
Orchestrate
3Operational
Scale
2Emerging
Pilot
1Foundational
Experiment

MIT CISR found enterprises at stages 3–4 perform well above their industry average financially, while those at stages 1–2 perform below it. Source

Take the self-assessment

08How we deliver · Accelerators

Manufacturing and cross-industry accelerators mean no service line starts from a blank page.

Pre-built, configurable starting points from delivered work, on the framework. Hover or tap a tile.

Manufacturing accelerators COO · CPO · CFO

Enterprise Cockpit 360Persona command centre on one enterprise model40+ persona views · automotive
Squad: Programme Margin WatcherCase study →
Agentic Decision PlatformStanding agents with money impact, owner & SLA14 agents · electronics ODM
Squad: Obsolescence Watcher, Capacity Conflict WatcherCase study →
SAP + DMS Data ModelPlan to finance, primary + secondary sales6 stages · FMCG & distribution
Squad: Secondary Sales ReconcilerCase study →
R&D Knowledge AssistantCited answers from LIMS / ELN and documents6 source-marker types
Squad: R&D Knowledge AssistantCase study →

Finance & cost CFO

CLARIONThree-way match, intercompany & distributor reconciliation
Squad: Three-Way Match AgentLaunch demo ↗
COMPASSPlant & product P&L, forecast & board pack
NARRATORAI month-end variance commentary
Squad: Variance Commentary WriterView →
Revenue AssurancePrice, scheme & rebate leakage
Squad: Scheme & Claim ValidatorView →

Operations & automation COO

Control Tower & Automation FoundryOperations and automation command centre
RPA AutomationBots for orders, claims & back office

Data Governance & Compliance CDO

Data Governance HubCatalog, lineage & master data quality
SOX ComplianceAutomated controls reporting
Manufacturing accelerator4 manufacturing accelerators from delivered builds plus cross-industry accelerators configured to manufacturing data; cross-industry demos run on banking sample data.
09How we deliver · Manufacturing accelerators

Four builds turned scattered plant, supplier and channel data into one decision system.

Agentic Decision PlatformElectronics design-and-build
14 standing agents: scan, reason, quantify, route
4 value-ledger stages, identified to realised
Enterprise Cockpit 360Automotive group
40+ persona views, board to plant and depot
1 reconciled enterprise model with grounded AI briefs
SAP + DMS Data ModelFMCG manufacturer
6 value-chain stages, plan to finance
2 sales layers joined: primary and secondary
R&D Knowledge AssistantMaterials science
6 source-marker types on every answer
Cited SQL, passages and figures behind each answer

Counts from platforms as built; demonstration data is modelled or sample data — capabilities, not client results.

decision platform / one alert
{ "agent": "programme-margin", "step": ["scan", "reason", "quantify", "route"], "arithmetic": "SQL", "model": "judges & recommends", "money_impact": "calculated, not guessed", "owner": "programme finance", "sla_clock": true, "actions": ["accept", "assign", "escalate", "dismiss"], "ledger": "identified → approved → in flight → realised" }

Agentic Decision Platform. An intelligence feed, not a dashboard: every alert has a money impact, an owner and a clock, and value is counted once in a ledger. Illustrative alert shape. See the case study →

10How we deliver · Supervised digital workforce

27 agent roles across 8 manufacturing domains — your people supervise the exceptions.

Agents work end to end across R&D, supply chain, plants, quality, maintenance, the channel, aftermarket and finance. Policy decides what goes straight through; people approve the exceptions — and quality, safety and recall decisions always stay with people.

Agents by manufacturing domain

Click a bar to see the agents in it.

Agent designs · manufacturing
27
agent roles across 8 manufacturing domains
6
Observe only
10
Suggest to a person
9
Act with approval
2
Act within limits

Agent designs from our AI & Agentic Engineering practice — not client results. The live control-room demo runs on banking sample data.

11How an agent works a case

An agent does the legwork on every case; a person makes the call when policy says so.

Illustrative replay: a supplier invoice doesn't match the purchase order and goods receipt. The Three-Way Match Agent works it.

Plan Act Check Humangate Log THREE-WAY MATCH AGENT Case resolved & logged 9 of 9 steps
  1. 1Source systemsA supplier invoice arrives that doesn't match its purchase order and goods receipt — a quantity was part-received and the unit price differs.
  2. 2Data fabricChange-data capture lands the invoice, PO and goods receipt from SAP MM and FI within minutes, quality-checked, as governed data products.
  3. 3Metadata & ontologyAll three resolve to the same supplier, part and plant on the golden master record, with lineage back to each source.
  4. 4ContextPrice agreements, tolerance rules, similar past mismatches and the payables procedure are assembled — only what this analyst may see.
  5. 5AgentPlans and calls tools through the secure AI gateway: get_invoice find_po_and_receipts get_price_agreement; proposes a match or a supplier query with evidence and a confidence score.
  6. 6PolicyKill switch, autonomy level, confidence ≥ 0.90 and a difference within tolerance decide: straight through, or to a person.
  7. 7Human gateThe accounts-payable lead reviews the evidence on one screen and approves, edits or rejects the proposal.
  8. 8ActionA governed, typed action posts the match — or drafts a supplier query or debit note — limited, idempotent and reversible.
  9. 9AuditEvery step, tool call and decision is recorded; outcomes feed the evaluation that decides whether autonomy can be raised.
12Autonomy & guardrails

Autonomy is set per agent and raised only on evidence — inside hard guardrails.

0 1 2 3 4 People do the workAgents do the work
Level 3 · Act within limits. Acts on its own inside policy limits; everything else is escalated.

Confidence threshold

Straight-through only if confidence, amount limit and evidence checks pass.

≥ 0.90min. confidence

Amount limits

Purchase orders, credit notes and invoice differences above the limit always go to a person.

Set per policyPO / credit note

Named human owner

Approves, edits or rejects every exception; quality, safety and recall decisions always need a person.

Alwayssafety-critical

Everything logged

Every plan, tool call and decision; overrides feed evaluation. Personal data masked in prompts.

8max tool calls / run

Kill switch

One control halts every agent at once.

Readystatus

Governance & controls

13Proof

Manufacturers and distributors are already running these platforms built by DaasLabs teams.

Builds for an automotive group, an electronics design-and-build manufacturer, an FMCG manufacturer and a materials R&D group. Client names withheld.

Electronics design-and-build · SAP, CRM, PLM and QMS

The risk lived where the systems met

Programmes quoted at one margin and delivering another, parts going end-of-life inside decade-long programmes, certificates tracked by hand. We built 14 standing agents that scan, reason, quantify and route — with arithmetic in SQL, alerts on an SLA clock and a value ledger from identified to realised.

FMCG manufacturer · SAP plus a distributor management system

Visibility stopped at the distributor

Primary sales in SAP, secondary sales in the DMS, master data duplicated. We built one layered model across 6 stages, plan to finance, with a golden master record, three-way match, consistent pricing and tax, and profitability by product and channel.

Automotive · lubricants JV & trading house

Enterprise Cockpit 360

CEO, CFO and board views with AI briefings; customer, supplier, site, cash and service 360s; control tower and scenario planner.

40+ persona views on one reconciled model
Materials R&D · LIMS / ELN plus documents

R&D Knowledge Assistant

Structured lab queries plus document retrieval, with vision that digitises charts, tables and formulas.

Every answer cited; formulations secured
Field operations · offline capture

Field Data Collector

Offline survey capture for field teams, synced into the governed platform.

4 survey types captured offline
Also delivered
Product information managementMarket early-warningOntology & knowledge graphGrounded chat on enterprise dataThree-way matchProfitability analysis

Capabilities as built; demonstration data is modelled or sample data, so we show what each platform does rather than client results.

14Value

What could a supervised agent squad free up in your business?

Move the sliders to your own volumes. Agents work the cases; people review only the exceptions.

e.g. invoice mismatches, scheme claims, warranty claims or supplier documents
Cases agents close within policy, with no human touch
Time for a person to check the agent's draft and approve
3,467
Hours saved per month
23.1
FTE equivalent (150 h / month)
USD 1.5M
Cost saved per year (USD 121,333 / month)
Human hours per month
Manual today
4,000 h
Supervised agents
533 h
Every 100 cases
60 go straight through40 go to a personOne supervisor can oversee 5,625 cases / month

Estimate only, not a quote or a DaasLabs result. Manual hours = cases × minutes ÷ 60. Supervised hours = cases × (1 − STP share) × review minutes ÷ 60. Hours saved = manual − supervised. FTE = hours saved ÷ 150. Cost saved = hours saved × cost per hour. Supervisor capacity = 150 h × 60 ÷ ((1 − STP share) × review minutes). Excludes platform and run costs.

15Why DaasLabs

Faster than services alone, a better fit than software alone.

How the DaasLabs model compares with the usual ways manufacturers deliver data, AI and agentic automation.

CriterionBig-4 / SIservices onlyPoint productssoftware onlyIn-house buildDaasLabsservices + framework + accelerators
Time to production value6–12 months3–6 months + integration12–18 months30–45 days
Manufacturing data models & domain depthGeneric methodsOne use caseBuildPre-built
Reusable data foundationRebuilt per projectVendor-specificBuildData Fabric Framework
Ready-made acceleratorsVariesSingle productNoneManufacturing + cross-industry
Supervised AI agents in operationsPilots / PoCsCopilot featuresBuild & governAgent squads with guardrails & AgentOps
Process change & adoptionYesLeft to the manufacturerPartialYes
Run & continuous improvementSeparate contractProduct supportInternal teamManaged services
Total cost of ownershipHighMedium–HighVery HighLow

Big-4 / SI (6–12 months), point products (3–6 months + integration) and in-house builds (12–18 months) are compared on larger screens.

16How we engage

Four phases, each ending with something you keep — and three ways to buy it.

1

Discovery & Planning

2–6 weeks

You receive a maturity assessment and target blueprint, with a prioritised roadmap.

Gate: pilot scope signed off
2

Analysis & Design

3–6 weeks

Target-state design and ontology, mapped to your controls; agent autonomy agreed with operations, quality and finance.

Gate: design authority
3

Build & Deploy

Sprints · pilot live in 30–45 days

Landing zone as code, pipelines, accelerators and agents configured and tested on real data.

Gate: go-live readiness
4

Support & Embed

Hypercare, then your choice

Runbooks, evaluation suites and knowledge transfer to a trained team.

Gate: handover sign-off
Ownership moves to you as the DaasLabs pod steps back
■ DaasLabs podWeekly status · bi-weekly steering · phase-gated sign-off■ Your team

Staff Augmentation

Architects, data and AI engineers embedded in your teams, under your delivery lead.

Best when you run the programme and need specialist capacity.

Project Delivery

Outcome-based delivery of an accelerator or platform build by a DaasLabs pod, with phase gates.

Best for a pilot or a new layer of the target architecture.

Managed Services

We run and improve the platform, models and agents — DataOps, MLOps and AgentOps under SLAs.

Best after handover, while your team builds its run capability.
17Pilot proposal

A 30–45 day accelerator pilot proves value on one use case before you commit to scale.

Fixed scope, fixed timeline, agreed success criteria — and a scale-up business case at the end.

One accelerator & its agent squad

Typically the decision platform for one risk class, warranty analytics for one product family, or primary + secondary sales for one region, with agents starting at “act with approval”.

2–3 source systems

e.g. SAP, the DMS and price & scheme masters — or warranty claims, service reports and build records.

One business unit

e.g. one plant, one product family or one sales region, with a named owner and SMEs for rules and UAT.

DaasLabs pod

Engagement lead, data engineer, domain SME, AI / agent engineer.

Activity → output
Wk 1
Wk 2
Wk 3
Wk 4
Wk 5
Wk 6
Discovery, data access, baseline→ Pilot charter & baseline
Week 1
Connect & curate sources on the framework→ Governed pilot dataset
Week 2
Configure rules, models & agents (autonomy, limits, guardrails)→ Working accelerator & agent squad
Weeks 3–4
Parallel run & UAT→ Measured results & override log
Week 5
Read-out & scale-up plan→ Business case & roadmap
Week 6
80%+
Items auto-matched or auto-generated
50%+
Less manual effort vs. baseline
100%
In-scope data with lineage & DQ checks
Go / no-go
Scale decision backed by a business case

Success-criteria targets are agreed in week 1.

18Next steps

Three steps take us from this conversation to value in production.

Start small with one accelerator, prove it, then scale on the same framework.

1

Scoping workshop

Walk through your data landscape and pain points, pick the pilot use case and agree success criteria.

1–2 weeks
2

Accelerator pilot

Deploy one accelerator and its agent squad on the framework against live data, and measure the result.

30–45 days
3

Scale & embed

Roll out across business units and further accelerators through project delivery or managed services.

Project or managed service

info@daaslabs.ai · Talk to us · Back to the site · © 2026 DaasLabs

Speaker notes

Up next

Elapsed

00:00