DaasLabs GCCs & IT Services ← Back to the site
DaasLabs · GCC, IT services & shared-services data and AI

Data & AI services for capability centres — advise, build, transform, run.

DaasLabs teams set your data and AI strategy, build the platforms, transform IT operations, security, finance and HR services, and run what we build — for global capability centres, IT and BPM service providers and enterprise shared services in India. Our Data Fabric Framework, pre-built accelerators and a supervised digital workforce of AI agents are how we deliver it faster.

9
Service lines, strategy to run
200+
Regulatory reports automated for a global card issuer’s India operations
30–45
Day pilot to a production-ready capability
6
ML models in the ITSM intelligence platform we built
02The challenge

Capability-centre data and AI programmes stall because every one starts from zero.

Tools inherited from every business unit, knowledge held in people’s heads and long implementations mean value arrives late — or not at all.

Sprawl
Several ITSM, monitoring, ERP and HRMS tools, one per business unit served
Repeat
The same incidents return under new ticket numbers; the fix lives in someone’s head
Late
SLA breaches and control failures found after the fact, often by an auditor
Manual
Access requests, reconciliations and evidence packs worked by hand

Patterns we found in delivered IT operations and shared-services work — not industry statistics.

0369121518 months Typical programme still no production value 1 2 3 4 DaasLabs pilot on the framework & an accelerator 30–45 days to a production-ready capability

1 · No governed data foundation

ITSM, CMDB, monitoring, ERP and HRMS don’t agree on services, owners or people — and lineage is unknown.

2 · Services firms rebuild from scratch

Each project re-invents pipelines, models and controls, so timelines and fees grow.

3 · Software alone doesn't change the process

Point products solve one use case and leave integration, data and adoption to the centre.

4 · AI pilots never reach production

Proofs of concept built without data, controls and an operating model stay on the shelf.

03Market shift

Capability centres are moving from dashboards and copilots to agents that triage, provision and test — under supervision.

Agents now read the queue, correlate the alerts, prepare the access grant and test the controls; a named person approves anything that changes a system.

Then · dashboards and copilots assist a person
Now · a person supervises many agents

So what for a capability centre: the operating model moves from “a person works the queue” to “agents do the work, a person supervises many agents” — which makes approvals, autonomy limits and audit trails the deciding capabilities, especially where access, production systems and ledgers are involved.

200+
Global card issuer’s India operations
Regulatory reports, 100% automated through a US-to-India migration, with zero compliance penalties since implementation.
DaasLabs case study
6
Gulf real-estate group’s IT function
ML models on live ticket data: anomalies, forecasts, resolution time, SLA risk, recurring issues and bottlenecks.
DaasLabs case study
3
Same IT function
Cooperating agents provisioning access — read, approve, act, notify — with every step in the execution log.
DaasLabs case study
6
IT services bid team
Specialist agents from RFP to reviewed response: analyst, extractor, compliance, risk, writer and reviewer.
DaasLabs case study

The 200+ figure is a client result; the others are counts from platforms as built. Client names withheld.

04Who we are

A services firm that arrives with its own IP — so capability centres pay for outcomes, not reinvention.

05What we do

Nine service lines cover the lifecycle, organised the way capability centres buy them.

Select a stage on the wheel, or start from your role.

Advise2 service lines Build2 service lines Transform4 service lines Run1 service line 9 service lines
Start from your role

Every service line runs on the same framework, accelerators and digital workforce. All services in detail →

06How we deliver · Data Fabric Framework

A repeatable 4C method turns raw operations data into production-ready capabilities in 30–45 days.

ITSM tickets & changes Monitoring, logs & events CMDB & service maps Identity & HRMS ERP ledgers (SAP, Oracle) Runbooks & documents 167+ pre-built connectors STEP 1 · WEEK 1–2 Connect 167+ connectors, batchand streaming, AI-assistedschema mapping STEP 2 · WEEK 2–4 Curate Standardise, cleanse,enrich: MDM, de-dupand data quality rules STEP 3 · WEEK 3–5 Contextualize Metadata catalog, criticaldata elements, multi-hoplineage, ownership, policy STEP 4 · WEEK 4–6 Consume Data products, APIs, BI,NLQ GenAI studio and theagents behind accelerators Accelerators AI agents BI: Power BI, Tableau APIs & data products NLQ GenAI studio Week 1Week 2Week 3Week 4Week 5Week 6 ConnectCurateContextualizeConsume Production-ready capability in 30–45 days
  1. Step 1 · Week 1–2Connect167+ pre-built connectors: ITSM, monitoring and logs, CMDB, identity and HRMS, ERP ledgers, and runbooks and documents; batch and streaming.
  2. Step 2 · Week 2–4CurateStandardise, cleanse and enrich: MDM, de-duplication and data quality rules.
  3. Step 3 · Week 3–5ContextualizeMetadata catalog, critical data elements, multi-hop lineage, ownership and policy.
  4. Step 4 · Week 4–6ConsumeData products, APIs, BI, NLQ GenAI studio and the agents behind each accelerator.
GovernancePolicies, ownership, operating model
Metadata & catalogCatalog and glossary
LineageMulti-hop, source to report
Data qualityRules, monitoring, controls
AI & agent layerGenAI, ML, agentic workflows
Security & auditRBAC, audit trails, IaC
Built in, not bolted on: foundation layers shared by every engagement — cloud-agnostic on Azure, AWS or hybrid, deployed with Infrastructure as Code.Full architecture →
07How we deliver · Target architecture

Twelve capability layers give every capability centre one blueprint — and one way to measure progress.

The same layers we build and score in the maturity assessment. Hover a layer to see what it does.

Data foundationConnected, understood, governed
2Data FabricConnect, ingest, CDC, transform
3Active Metadata FabricDiscover, classify, understand and govern data
Meaning & knowledgeBusiness meaning, usable context
4Enterprise OntologyBusiness objects, relationships, semantics
5Knowledge FabricKnowledge graph, vector, documents
6Context EngineeringThe right context for people and agents
Intelligence & actionModels, agents, enterprise actions
1Secure AI GatewayModel access, routing, security
7Agent FabricBuild, orchestrate and run agents
8Action FabricExecute enterprise actions safely
12Enterprise AutomationEvent, API and schedule-driven
Trust & experienceGovern, evaluate, deliver
9Governance & SecurityRBAC/ABAC, policies, approvals, lineage
10AI LifecycleEvaluation, versioning, testing, monitoring
11Experience LayerCopilots, dashboards, apps, workflows

Runs in your cloud tenancy or on-prem. Code, ontology and agents are handed over — you own what we build. Explore the blueprint →

Maturity: five stages, scored on evidence
5Transformational
AI-native
4Systemic
Orchestrate
3Operational
Scale
2Emerging
Pilot
1Foundational
Experiment

MIT CISR found enterprises at stages 3–4 perform well above their industry average financially, while those at stages 1–2 perform below it. Source

Take the self-assessment

08How we deliver · Accelerators

GCC and cross-industry accelerators mean no service line starts from a blank page.

Pre-built, configurable starting points from delivered work, on the framework. Hover or tap a tile.

GCC & IT services accelerators CIO · CISO · GCC head

ITSM Intelligence PlatformCopilot, incidents, SLA risk & recurring issues6 ML models · enterprise IT
Squad: Ticket Triage, SLA Risk SentinelCase study →
SLA Integrity & Audit IntelligenceSLA gaming, ITGC tests & explainable findings5-step investigation
Squad: SLA Integrity Analyst, ITGC Control TesterCase study →
Access Provisioning SquadRead, approve, provision, notify — logged3 agents · human approval
Squad: Access Request Reader, Provisioning BotCase study →
MCP Studio & RFP agentsAPIs as agent tools; RFP to reviewed response6 RFP agents
Squad: API Tool Builder, Bid Response WriterCase study →

Finance shared services CFO

CLARIONBank, intercompany & vendor reconciliation
Squad: Reconciliation MatcherLaunch demo ↗
COMPASSEntity P&L, forecast & board pack
NARRATORAI month-end variance commentary
Squad: Variance Commentary WriterView →
Enterprise ReconciliationMulti-entity, multi-ERP recon

Operations & automation COO

Control Tower & Automation FoundryOperations and automation command centre
RPA AutomationBots for IT, HR & back office

Governance & IT controls CISO

Data Governance HubCatalog, lineage & data quality
SOX ComplianceAutomated controls reporting
GCC acceleratorAccelerators from delivered builds plus cross-industry accelerators configured for shared services; cross-industry demos run on banking sample data.
09How we deliver · What the builds do

From finance reports to the service desk, our builds turn queues into supervised, evidenced work.

Finance data automationGlobal card issuer’s India operations
200+ regulatory reports, 100% automated
Zero compliance penalties since implementation
ITSM Intelligence PlatformGulf real-estate group’s IT
6 ML models on live ticket data
8 copilot intents, SLA analysis to ticket creation
SLA Integrity & AuditSame IT function
5 investigation steps, detection to remediation
3 levels of root-cause analysis
Access Provisioning SquadSame IT function
3 cooperating agents behind an approval queue
Logged every execution, with a kill switch

The card-issuer figures are client results from our published case study; the others are counts from platforms as built.

provisioning squad / one request
{ "squad": "access-provisioning", "read": "queue monitor + LLM", "extract": ["user", "role", "permissions"], "approval": "named approver, always", "act": "RPA bot creates user & assigns", "notify": "requester emailed, ticket updated", "log": "every task, tool call & decision", "kill_switch": true }

Access Provisioning Squad. Reading a request and granting it are separate steps, with a named approver in between and every step logged. Illustrative request shape. See the case study →

10How we deliver · Supervised digital workforce

30 agent roles across 8 capability-centre domains — your people supervise the exceptions.

Agents work end to end across the service desk, cloud operations, engineering, security, finance, HR, the AI CoE and audit. Policy decides what goes straight through; people approve the exceptions — and no access grant, production change or posting is made by an agent alone.

Agents by domain

Click a bar to see the agents in it.

Agent designs · GCCs & IT services
30
agent roles across 8 capability-centre domains
4
Observe only
15
Suggest to a person
5
Act with approval
6
Act within limits

Agent designs from our AI & Agentic Engineering practice — not client results. The live control-room demo runs on banking sample data.

11How an agent works a case

An agent does the legwork on every case; a person makes the call when policy says so.

Illustrative replay: a new joiner needs access to a finance application and a shared folder. The access-provisioning squad works it.

Plan Act Check Humangate Log ACCESS PROVISIONING SQUAD Access granted & logged 9 of 9 steps
  1. 1Source systemsAn access request arrives in the ITSM queue for a new joiner: a finance-application role and a shared-folder permission.
  2. 2Data fabricThe ticket, the HRMS joiner record and the role catalogue land within minutes, quality-checked, as governed data products.
  3. 3Metadata & ontologyRequest, employee, manager and approver resolve to the same identity record, with lineage back to each source.
  4. 4ContextRole catalogue, segregation-of-duties rules, the approval matrix and similar past grants are assembled — only what this squad may see.
  5. 5AgentThe queue monitor reads the request with an LLM and calls tools through the secure AI gateway: get_ticket get_hr_record check_sod_rules; it proposes the role set with evidence and a confidence score.
  6. 6PolicyKill switch, autonomy level, confidence ≥ 0.90 and the segregation-of-duties check run — and any access grant always goes to a person.
  7. 7Human gateThe named approver reviews the request, evidence and SoD result on one screen and approves, edits or rejects.
  8. 8ActionThe RPA provisioning bot creates the user and assigns the approved permissions — typed, limited and reversible — and the notification agent tells the requester.
  9. 9AuditEvery task, tool call and decision lands in the execution log; outcomes feed the evaluation that decides whether autonomy can change.
12Autonomy & guardrails

Autonomy is set per agent and raised only on evidence — inside hard guardrails.

0 1 2 3 4 People do the workAgents do the work
Level 3 · Act within limits. Acts on its own inside policy limits; everything else is escalated.

Confidence threshold

Straight-through only if confidence, amount limit and evidence checks pass.

≥ 0.90min. confidence

Change limits

Access grants, production changes and ledger postings always go to a person, whatever the confidence.

Alwaysaccess / prod / ledger

Named human owner

Approves, edits or rejects every exception; decisions about people and audit findings always need a person.

Alwayspeople & findings

Everything logged

Every plan, tool call and decision; overrides feed evaluation. Personal data masked in prompts, in line with the DPDP Act.

8max tool calls / run

Kill switch

One control halts every agent at once.

Readystatus

Governance & controls

13Proof

Capability centres and IT functions already run what DaasLabs teams built.

A finance automation result for a global card issuer’s India operations, and builds on the ITSM estate of a Gulf real-estate group. Client names withheld.

Global card issuer’s India operations · US-to-India data-centre migration

Moving finance to India without missing a deadline

25 critical finance processes had to be reconfigured under strict regulatory timelines, with month-end close taking 12+ days and 30+ staff on overtime. End-to-end finance data integration delivered 100% automated generation of all 200+ regulatory reports, zero compliance penalties since implementation and regulatory updates in hours, not weeks. “[It] paid for itself in one year just in avoided overtime costs.”

Gulf real-estate group’s IT function · existing ITSM tool

From reporting SLAs to predicting them

Recurring incidents, late-seen breaches and gamed pauses. We built a copilot and 6 ML models on the live ticket data, a 5-step SLA-integrity investigation with continuous ITGC tests, and a 3-agent provisioning squad behind a human approval queue.

IT services · bid team

RFP & Bid Response Agents

Document analyst, requirement extractor, compliance checker, risk assessor, response writer and quality reviewer, orchestrated from RFP to draft.

6 specialist agents; the bid lead signs off
IT services · delivery

Helios agentic programme management

Charter, WBS, RAID and benefits stood up from a brief; earned value and schedule integrity computed by tools, never by the model.

DCMA 14-point check on every update
AI engineering · platform

MCP Studio & LLM security

REST and OpenAPI APIs turned into governed agent tools, and a 17-layer defence framework for GenAI applications.

APIs become tools; GenAI behind guardrails
Also delivered
Enterprise GenAI platform with RBAC / ABACRisk & RegTech explorerKnowledge base & runbooksExecutive operations centreContract lifecycle managementDB Utils MCP server, 25+ databases

The card-issuer figures are client results from our published case study; the other builds are described by what they do.

14Value

What could a supervised agent squad free up in your business?

Move the sliders to your own volumes. Agents work the cases; people review only the exceptions.

e.g. service-desk tickets, access requests, invoice exceptions or reconciliation breaks
Cases agents close within policy, with no human touch
Time for a person to check the agent's draft and approve
3,467
Hours saved per month
23.1
FTE equivalent (150 h / month)
₹5.0 cr
Cost saved per year (₹41.6 lakh / month)
Human hours per month
Manual today
4,000 h
Supervised agents
533 h
Every 100 cases
60 go straight through40 go to a personOne supervisor can oversee 5,625 cases / month

Estimate only, not a quote or a DaasLabs result. Manual hours = cases × minutes ÷ 60. Supervised hours = cases × (1 − STP share) × review minutes ÷ 60. Hours saved = manual − supervised. FTE = hours saved ÷ 150. Cost saved = hours saved × cost per hour, shown in rupees (1 lakh = ₹1,00,000; 1 crore = ₹1,00,00,000). Supervisor capacity = 150 h × 60 ÷ ((1 − STP share) × review minutes). Excludes platform and run costs.

15Why DaasLabs

Faster than services alone, a better fit than software alone.

How the DaasLabs model compares with the usual ways capability centres deliver data, AI and agentic automation.

CriterionBig-4 / SIservices onlyPoint productssoftware onlyIn-house buildDaasLabsservices + framework + accelerators
Time to production value6–12 months3–6 months + integration12–18 months30–45 days
ITSM, controls & shared-services depthGeneric methodsOne use caseBuildPre-built
Reusable data foundationRebuilt per projectVendor-specificBuildData Fabric Framework
Ready-made acceleratorsVariesSingle productNoneGCC + cross-industry
Supervised AI agents in operationsPilots / PoCsCopilot featuresBuild & governAgent squads with guardrails & AgentOps
Process change & adoptionYesLeft to the centrePartialYes
Run & continuous improvementSeparate contractProduct supportInternal teamManaged services
Total cost of ownershipHighMedium–HighVery HighLow

Big-4 / SI (6–12 months), point products (3–6 months + integration) and in-house builds (12–18 months) are compared on larger screens.

16How we engage

Four phases, each ending with something you keep — and three ways to buy it.

1

Discovery & Planning

2–6 weeks

You receive a maturity assessment and target blueprint, with a prioritised roadmap.

Gate: pilot scope signed off
2

Analysis & Design

3–6 weeks

Target-state design and ontology, mapped to your controls; agent autonomy agreed with security, operations and finance.

Gate: design authority
3

Build & Deploy

Sprints · pilot live in 30–45 days

Landing zone as code, pipelines, accelerators and agents configured and tested on real data.

Gate: go-live readiness
4

Support & Embed

Hypercare, then your choice

Runbooks, evaluation suites and knowledge transfer to a trained team.

Gate: handover sign-off
Ownership moves to you as the DaasLabs pod steps back
■ DaasLabs podWeekly status · bi-weekly steering · phase-gated sign-off■ Your team

Staff Augmentation

Architects, data and AI engineers embedded in your teams, under your delivery lead.

Best when you run the programme and need specialist capacity.

Project Delivery

Outcome-based delivery of an accelerator or platform build by a DaasLabs pod, with phase gates.

Best for a pilot or a new layer of the target architecture.

Managed Services

We run and improve the platform, models and agents — DataOps, MLOps and AgentOps under SLAs.

Best after handover, while your team builds its run capability.
17Pilot proposal

A 30–45 day accelerator pilot proves value on one use case before you commit to scale.

Fixed scope, fixed timeline, agreed success criteria — and a scale-up business case at the end.

One accelerator & its agent squad

Typically ITSM intelligence for one service queue, access provisioning for one application, or reconciliation for one entity, with agents starting at “act with approval”.

2–3 source systems

e.g. the ITSM tool, the HRMS and the directory — or ERP ledgers, bank statements and intercompany balances.

One business unit

e.g. one service tower, one business unit served or one entity, with a named owner and SMEs for rules and UAT.

DaasLabs pod

Engagement lead, data engineer, ITSM or finance SME, AI / agent engineer — India-based, alongside your teams.

Activity → output
Wk 1
Wk 2
Wk 3
Wk 4
Wk 5
Wk 6
Discovery, data access, baseline→ Pilot charter & baseline
Week 1
Connect & curate sources on the framework→ Governed pilot dataset
Week 2
Configure rules, models & agents (autonomy, limits, guardrails)→ Working accelerator & agent squad
Weeks 3–4
Parallel run & UAT→ Measured results & override log
Week 5
Read-out & scale-up plan→ Business case & roadmap
Week 6
80%+
Items auto-matched or auto-generated
50%+
Less manual effort vs. baseline
100%
In-scope data with lineage & DQ checks
Go / no-go
Scale decision backed by a business case

Success-criteria targets are agreed in week 1.

18Next steps

Three steps take us from this conversation to value in production.

Start small with one accelerator, prove it, then scale on the same framework.

1

Scoping workshop

Walk through your data landscape and pain points, pick the pilot use case and agree success criteria.

1–2 weeks
2

Accelerator pilot

Deploy one accelerator and its agent squad on the framework against live data, and measure the result.

30–45 days
3

Scale & embed

Roll out across business units and further accelerators through project delivery or managed services.

Project or managed service

info@daaslabs.ai · Talk to us · Back to the site · © 2026 DaasLabs

Speaker notes

Up next

Elapsed

00:00